During an April interview with Ellen Degeneres, the comedian remarked on how she felt Smith’s actions were a disservice to her, Schumer, and Hall. Sykes has also spoken about the incident. “And I was just thinking, ‘What am I going to do when I go out there?’” “Everybody was just kind of floored with the whole thing,” Schumer said of the incident in an interview with Andy Cohen one month later. Operations.Barbara Ehrenreich, Activist and ‘Myth Busting' Writer of ‘Nickel and Dimed,' Dies TR's inbox processing step allowedĬreation of projects with multiple actions,Įditing of items as they are being processed, and Scheduled tasks, tasks with no due date with startĭate <= today delegated tasks with followupĭate <= today and arranged by priority and time Views, and I found myself pushing them to theĮxtreme. TR has a more powerful set of filters for its Hierarchy, context, and due dates in GQueues. I want to see the entire project, with completedĪnd uncompleted tasks all together, regardless ofĬontext. To keep projects together rather than hierarchy. This, but the example video of doing GTD uses tags This is one thing that GQueues seems capable of The last step wasĪlways to set up the next review as a future Way, if I got interrupted (which I always did), IĬould step my way through the remainder of the Template for my daily and weekly reviews. Would have the original task as its dependency.Īble to execute all the GTD processes on a regularīasis in large part because I set up a project The original task, or a "and then" task which New "but first" task which will be a dependency of Would be the ability to select a task and create a One of the most powerfulįeatures I can think of in a task tracking app Tasks and have the next one appear when I check Planning in GQueues, so that I can set up ordered With GQueues I can't even move an item from the inbox directly to a subtask as far as I can tell. TR's inbox processing step allowed creation of projects with multiple actions, editing of items as they are being processed, and do/delegate/defer/delete as first class operations. My "today" view was a combination of scheduled tasks, tasks with no due date with start date <= today delegated tasks with followup date <= today and arranged by priority and time required. TR has a more powerful set of filters for its views, and I found myself pushing them to the extreme. I haven't found a good way to balance hierarchy, context, and due dates in GQueues. I want to see the entire project, with completed and uncompleted tasks all together, regardless of context. This is one thing that GQueues seems capable of this, but the example video of doing GTD uses tags to keep projects together rather than hierarchy. The last step was always to set up the next review as a future project with the appropriate start date. This way, if I got interrupted (which I always did), I could step my way through the remainder of the process until I was done. I was able to execute all the GTD processes on a regular basis in large part because I set up a project template for my daily and weekly reviews. One of the most powerful features I can think of in a task tracking app would be the ability to select a task and create a new "but first" task which will be a dependency of the original task, or a "and then" task which would have the original task as its dependency. I would really like to do my project planning in GQueues, so that I can set up ordered tasks and have the next one appear when I check off the previous one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |